Would you rob a bank if you had a great chance of escaping? Would you steal a car if you knew the cops wouldn’t find you? For the sake of morals, I would hope your answer is no. These social taboos are simple and are, for the most part easily understood but, why is this not the case in pirating copyrighted material? Illegal file-sharing over computers has existed for quite some time dating back to the start of personal computers, how ever the true epidemic began when this sharing of music, movies and software hit the mainstream public. Napster, the first peer-to-peer network that had gained an enormous following, led the charge on the distribution of all sorts of media. The program’s popularity grew larger day by day, which in effect caused the music and movie industry to take a hit on sales. The positives in downloading these files greatly outweighed the negatives to average computer users. Downloading was easy, quick, and not to forget, it was free! There have been many fights to end or at least contain piracy, most often led by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). The RIAA represents almost all of the media industry and is in charge of the profit it gains, so for obvious reasons piracy is a big deal to them. Through copyright infringement such as file-sharing, the software industry has lost an estimated 13 billion dollars per year, the music industry garnered a loss of 4.1 billion dollars, and the movie industry was out 2.5 billion dollars. These numbers are staggering and there was definitely a need to battle this crisis. The RIAA’s method of fighting back has been through issuing lawsuits to major offenders, some say it’s merely a scare tactic, while the RIAA is adamantly preaching that the steep reparations are for the losses that one offender has caused.
These court cases however, have not set into people’s minds enough to stop them from obtaining illegal material. File-sharing is still very large in the computer community and is showing no signs of slowing down. Technology always seems to be one step ahead of the law as well as the RIAA. When one hosting program gets shut down, two more sprout up to replace it. The RIAA often said piracy is like a bad case of acne, there seems to be no end. Ironically, teenagers are at the forefront of both problems, acne as well as piracy. The Washington Post reported “More than half of young Americans with Internet access continue to download free music even though they know that they are breaking the law.” They go on to add “Eighty-eight percent of the respondents know that most popular music is copyrighted, but 56 percent download it anyway, according to the survey of 1,183 children, ages eight to eighteen.” This in itself shows that downloading media just does not coincide with other crimes which there are direct interactions. Colin Hatcher, a journalist who is investigating piracy writes on how the pirates think of themselves as Robin Hood type figures, meaning they take from the rich and give to the poor. A very heroic outlook on the situation but I don’t think stealing the latest music is comparable to feeding the poor.
The programs that are allowing people to download music are the first to get attacked by enforcers such as the RIAA. The programs evolve as each predecessor is caught and as time goes on these peer-to-peer networks are getting stronger and more fool-proof. As mentioned before, the first widely used program was Napster, after a year of success it was forced to cease and desist from sharing any copyrighted materials. Following programs learned from Napster’s mistakes. Instead of hosting files, these programs were just used to transport a file from one person’s computer to another; they basically acted as a mediator. The programs are convenient and socially accepted so it has become a norm in today’s world. Why would anyone pay for something they can get for free? Personally, as a college student I don’t always have fifteen dollars to buy the newest music album by an artist, but I do have a computer. Programs such as I-tunes where people can buy individual songs for as cheap as a dollar is a good move on the industries part, but most Ipod’s can hold 7,500 songs. That means it would cost $7,500 dollars to fill up the mp3 player that you bought for only two hundred dollars. If given a choice to spend thousands of dollars on music, movies and software opposed to getting them for free, I’m sure most would lean towards the latter.
From floppy disks to mp3s, sharing has always had a large part in the computer world. However, the problem is the legal nature in what we are sharing. Too many people, downloading pirated material is an act of rebellion against the stingy media kingdom, and to some downloading files is not even a thought. Groups such as the RIAA are fighting for what in reality is the right thing, but their controversial methods have them coming off as the villain. Downloading illegal files is a crime, meaning I am a criminal and I wouldn’t be surprised if every person reading this is one as well, but none the less we all have our reasons. Music and movie prices seem to be constantly growing and it has come to a level where people resort to secondary means, which more often then not is pirating.

